Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1844

reference
21-tree-1
name
1844
tree-preservation-order

undefined

21-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.937424 50.853986)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.937367 50.853979,-0.937370 50.853991,-0.937378 50.854001,-0.937390 50.854009,-0.937406 50.854014,-0.937423 50.854016,-0.937441 50.854014,-0.937457 50.854009,-0.937469 50.854002,-0.937478 50.853992,-0.937481 50.853980,-0.937478 50.853969,-0.937470 50.853959,-0.937458 50.853951,-0.937442 50.853946,-0.937425 50.853944,-0.937407 50.853946,-0.937391 50.853951,-0.937378 50.853958,-0.937370 50.853968,-0.937367 50.853979)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL